Document Type : Original Manuscript

Authors

Abstract

A common way to join dissimilar materials in industrial applications is to use adhesives. Marine industries use this kind of joints for attaching main hull to superstructure of the ships. Most previous researches have focused on composite-composite joints, while a few of them are devoted to aluminum- sandwich panel joints. This study focuses on the numerical static strength analysis of a typical aluminum-sandwich panel T-joints and improving its strength through a novel design. The results of numerical analyses are in a good agreement with those of the experimental tests and confirm the accuracy of numerical analyses. In analyzing the adhesive between joint elements, contact elements and cohesive zone model (CZM) in ANSYS as well as nonlinear analysis is used. Results show that change in joint geometry considered in this paper, caused a 7.25% increase in vertical failure load of the joint. This increase in strength of joint attained in a situation that because of the merging of the joined parts, the process of construction became easier.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aalberg A., Langseth M., Malo K.A. 1998. Ultimate strength of stiffened aluminum plates. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Structural Engineering.
ANSYS 11 User’s Manual.
Blake J.I.R., Shenoi R.A., House J., Turton T. 2001. Progressive damage analysis of tee joints with viscoelastic inserts. Composites  Part A. 32: 641-653.
Dodkins A. R., Shenoi R. A., Hawkins G. L. 1994. Design of joints and attachments in FRP ships structures. Marine Structures. 7: 365-398.
 
Dharmawan F., et al. 2004. Geometry and damage effects in a composite marine
T-joint. Composite Structures. 66: 181–7.
Dharmawan F., Li H. C. H., Herszberg I., John S. 2006. Fracture behavior of composite maritime T-joints. Composite Structures. 75: 339–50.
Derewonko A. 2009. Prediction of the failure metal/composite bonded joints. Computational Materials Science. 45: 735–738.
Hayman B., et al. 2007. Design of X-joints in sandwich structures for naval vessels. 10th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Kumari S., Sinha P. K. 2002. Finite element analysis of composite wing T-joints. Reinforced Plastic Composites. 21: 1561-1585.
Khalili S. M. R., Ghaznavi A. 2011. Numerical analysis of adhesively bonded T-joints with structural sandwiches and study of design parameters. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives. 31: 374-356.
Phillips H. J., Shenoi R. A. 1998. Damage tolerance of laminated tee joints in FRP structures. Composites Part A. 29: 465-478.
Rispler A. R., Steven G. P., Tong L. 1997. Failure analysis of composite T-Joints including inserts. Reinforced Plastic Composites. 16: 1642-1658.
Shenoi R. A., Hawkins G. L. 1992. Influence of material and geometry variations on the behavior of bonded tee connections in FRP ships. Composites. 23: 335-345.
Stenius I., Rosen A., Kuttenkeuler J. 2011. On structural design of energy efficient small high-speed craft. Marine Structure. 24: 43-59.
Scott Bader Company, Adhesive catalog.
Toftegaard H., Lystrup A. 2005. Design and test of lightweight sandwich T-joint for naval ships. Composites Part A. 36: 1055-1065.
Zhou D. W., Louca L. A., Saunders M. 2008. Numerical simulation of sandwich T-joints under dynamic loading. Composites Part B. 39: 973–985.