Document Type : Original Manuscript

Authors

1 Maritime Transport Department, Khoramshahr University of Marine Science & Technology

2 Maritime Economics Department, Khoramshahr University of Marine Science & Technology

Abstract

Ports in order to increase income and prosperity looking to create attractions and incentives to attract shippers and ship owners. Port in a geographic area has the potential for development can play a central role or hub port compared to other competitors, and attract more goods and thus better economic situation. Increased competition to attract companies and ships in the Persian Gulf ports of Jebel Ali and surveying the challenges and factors affecting hub ports are necessary southern Iran.
The first three southern port of Chabahar, martyr Rajai and Imam Khomeini, the hub of the five main indicator of geographic location, operations, Hinterland, economic and customs using multi-criteria analysis, AHP model were compared and prioritized. The results of the analysis shows that the indicators, factors related to the geographical location of the 50.7% and 5.6% respectively, the highest and lowest priority customs and the best port, Port martyr Rajai weighing 64.6% of the greater importance of the hub is entitled to two ports.
The second section examines the significance of each of the factors affecting the martyr Rajai Port Hub latest deals. Statistical information for the analysis and testing hypotheses from binomial test was used and the application spss16. The results show that the port services, port location, Infrastructure and superstructure and speed Customs the most effective and the least impact on the dry port hub is the latest martyr Rajai port.

Keywords

Main Subjects

shahidrajaeeport.pmo.ir, Availabiliyy date (3-2-2013), 8:21.
http://www.pmo.ir.
Emad,Gh. And zare,H.2014. solution for improving the position of national and regional chabahar port transit.teenty-frist conference on marine organisms. ramsar,Iran.
Ghasemi fard, B. 2014. Check rwducing waiting timemerchant ship in dry bulk docks using queuing theory. M.Sc. chabahar university of maritime and marine science.
Safarzadeh M , Hamidi H, Azizabadi  A , mohammad SH. 2006. Marine transportation. Secret knowledge press.
Ghaumi,A. and Momemi,M.2013.statistical analysis using spss.
Moshiri, A. 2001. AHPmodel adjusted or survey decision group.knowledge management press.
Kbina van dyck, G. 2015. The Drive for a Regional Hub Port for West Africa: General Requirements and Capacity Forecast. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 36-44.
Anvar, Z. 2010. Gwadar sea Port’s deep s emergence as regional trade and
transportation hub: prospects and problems. Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 97-112.
Wilmsmeier, G. and Martinez-zarzoso, I.2010. Regional hub port development  –Thecase of Montevideo,Uruguay. Inter nationalassociation of maritime economists, 1-19.
TAI, H-h. and Hwang, C-ch. 2005.  Analysis of hub port choice for container trunk lines in east asia. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp: 907 – 919.
Aversa,R., Botter, RC., Haralambids, HC. and Yoshizaki, HTY. 2005.A  Mixed  Integer  programming Model on thegramming Location of a Hub Port in the East Coast of South America. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1-18.
Veldman,SJ.and Bu¨ckmann, EH.2003. A Model on Container Port Competitio : An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports.  Maritime Economics & Logistics, 3-22.
World Bank.2001. Port Reform Toolkit, World Bank: Washington DC.
Hoffmann, J. Date Issued:2000-08,p. 117-138 Published in: CEPAL Review   No.71.